Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Clint Bisbee's avatar

There’s a charming Japanese novel titled “The Cat Who Saved Books”

And there’s a section with a character who creates book summaries so people can consume them faster. The character also loves music, and has a cassette of a concerto or something playing, and the hero puts the tape on fast forward and asks “is this the same?”

Always think of that when I see book summary services used for the purpose of speeding up consumption.

David Black MD's avatar

As a fellow bibliophile, I agree with you.

AI people criticize me for using ChatGPT primarily as a super search engine. I am learning how to get quite a bit of mileage out of it.

BUT

ONLY when I already know quite a bit about the subject I'm inquiring about.

This is very similar to how doctors interpret lab tests and imaging reports.

We, only very rarely, are surprised by the results.

If the cardiogram report saysvthatvacrigust 35 year old has evidence of an old heart attack, some probably got two leads misplaced.

I cannot rely on ChatGPT to summarize its own findings accurately, so I simply copy the original findings into Google Docs for further analysis.

How ANY can think that a prof could be fooled by an essay produced by AI, I do not know.

20 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?